data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b5c6/4b5c65031daf43d78a781833c6a9f9ed839aca3b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf44f/cf44f541298ab61bf96da25ec9ce7c92ba6f5cdb" alt=""
Murphy also wrote a screenplay by the same name. The short story and information about the film are included in the back matter of this comic, allowing the reader to see how the story has been translated into each of these mediums.There are a number of differences in the telling of the story in these differing forms. This is a great example of the importance of inclusion and exclusion- Scott McCloud discusses this in his book, Understanding Comics. He explains that what one leaves in or out of comics has an effect of the overall perception of the story. This can be seen through what is included and excluded in the three different mediums this story has been told using.The short story, for example, gives a lot more background details to the story that the comic does not convey, and the comic has a much more simplified storyline. The short story features dialogue, whereas the comic is completely silent. The short story has a narrator, placing the reader in the role of the main character, calling him or her 'you', whereas the comic presents the main character visually as separate from the reader, as if he or she were watching him and his wife's adventures from nearby.
Indeed, Duncan and Smith theorize that authorship and the act of creating are reductive, as the author , as McCloud discusses, has many choices about what material to include and what to leave out, since every detail of the story cannot be conveyed. McCloud discusses the effects that leaving certain elements in or out of a comic can have on a reader's impression of the story. As we have seen, the best way to tell a story can sometimes vary, depending on medium. Duncan and Smith theorize that while the creation process is reductive, the act of reading comics is additive, as the reader has an active role in the meaning making of the work. He or she must 'fill in the gaps', as they go through, such as the space between panels, called the gutter. Different transitions of panels in time and subject matter demand reader involvement to understand what is happening in the story. In this particular comic, no narration is given whatsoever, so the reader must work even harder to put the images together into one cohesive whole.
Douglas Wolk discusses the effect of drawing and line style on the reader's interpretation- The line style is clean, yet almost 'furry', allowing for a lot of texture and shading. This emphasizes the drama and horror of the piece in doing so as dramatic lights and darks are emphasized within the black and white palate. this gives the comic a spooky, ominous, horrific mood, and suspense is slowly built up throughout the work.
Dylan Horrocks discusses multimodality in comics in his article "Inventing Comics;Scott McCloud Defines the Form in Understanding Comics" and one can see that different mediums are combined in this comic- the panels are horizontal and landscape- oriented, mimicking the widescreen view of films.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bf0d/3bf0dc3aa7463a99261478113c56581c3f660f5f" alt=""
This page (to the upper left) is an example of what Scott McCloud calls an aspect -to aspect panel transition. Aspect to Aspect transitions are ones in which the panels depict different aspects of a scene- on this page, the first shows the headlights of the car. the second, the main characters. the third, a closeup of the key in the ignition and the keychain attached to it, and so on. It does not focus on the two characters in a moment to moment transition, such as other pages do. (see above). This demonstrates that more than one type of panel transition are possible within the same work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d7b2/2d7b2d4f630ea435956bbc3cf794847bc628d4f9" alt=""
Though short, this comic was an interesting read and it was interesting to compare the different mediums used in telling this story.
Works Cited
Hague, Ian. "Eyes Like Comics, or, Ocularcentrism in Comics Scholarship."Comics and the Senses:A Multisensory Approach to Comics and Graphic Novels.London:Routledge,2014. 9-33.
Cohn, Jesse."Mise-En-Page:A Vocabulary of Page Layouts."Teaching the Graphic Novel. Ed.Stephen E. tabachnick.New York:Modern Language Association, 2009.44-57.
Duncan, Randy and Matthew J. Smith. "Experiencing the Story." The Power of Comics: History, Form, and Culture.New York: Continuum, 2009.153-70.
Duncan, Randy and Matthew J. Smith. "Experiencing the Story." The Power of Comics: History, Form, and Culture.New York: Continuum, 2009.153-70.
Horrocks,Dylan."Inventing Comics;Scott McCloud Defines the Form in Understanding Comics."The Comics Journal #234 (June 2011):29-52
Magnussen, Anne.”The
Semiotics of C.S. Pierce as a Theoretical Framework for the
Understanding of
Comics.” Comics and Culture: Analytical and Theoretical
Approaches to Comics. Eds. Anne Magnussen and Hans-Christian
Christensen. Copenhagen:
Museum Tusculanum
P, 2000.193-207.
McCloud, Scott.
Understanding Comics. New York: Harper Perennial, 1994.
Thompson, Craig.
Goodbye, Chunky Rice. 5Th ed. Toronto: Random House
of Canada, Limited., 2004.
20-21. Print.
Wolk, Douglas.
“Pictures, Words, and the Space Between Them.” Reading Comics.
New
York: Da Capo
Press, 2007. 118-34
No comments:
Post a Comment